checkForBlocks booleans show up as options for destination parameter using /tp

Why do you think this is incorrect behavior?
What do you expect to happen instead?
For maximum clarity, the following format for bug reports is recommended:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. (list every step completely, so someone else can reproduce the issue, and try following your list to make sure you can still reproduce the issue yourself)
2.
3.
Observed Results:
(briefly describe what you see happen, including any message(s) shown)
Expected Results:
(briefly describe what should happen)

(add screenshots or video to help explain the issue)

This report has been temporarily closed as Awaiting Response. It will automatically reopen when you add information. Please follow the format shown and include all sections (steps, observed, expected). Reports that do not contain all of the requested information and complete steps to reproduce the issue may be closed as Incomplete. For more information please read the Bug Tracker Guidelines.

You may find this Report Creation Form helpful for any future reports you create.

Am I supposed to respond here? Or edit the original? I don't know, so I'm doing both.

Steps to  Reproduce:{*}{*}

1. Load a Minecraft: Bedrock Edition world with cheats enabled.

2. Open chat.

3. Type /tp or /teleport.

4. Type the name of a player (probably yourself).

5. Press space, making the next argument's options appear on the autocomplete.

Observed Results:

The autocomplete shows the true and false Boolean options that should appear for the checkForBlocks argument. When using these Boolean options, it does not work, as the syntax was expecting a player or coordinates.

Expected Results:

The autocomplete does not show the Booleans on this argument, instead showing them only on the checkForBlock argument.

As of the latest versions, the suggestion now requires to provide either the coordinates or both the victim and the target, such as:

• /tp @s @s true

• /tp ~~~ true

Both of these commands execute correctly. Are you still able to reproduce the issue on your end?