[MCL-32] Bouncycastle error on new Launcher.

I've been messing around with older versions of Minecraft on the new launcher.

So far, I've got all versions to work except Indev, InfDev , Alpha 1.0.4 and 1.3+

Indev, InfDev and Alpha 1.0.4 doesn't work because of the way they were coded. (Main classes are different)

I need to know why 1.3+ wont work. The singleplayer internal server was implemented 1.3 so I'm guessing it has something to do with that.

All other versions works without any problems.

Crash report has been attached.

Linked issues

duplicates 1

MC-6399 Won't login / doesnt respect JVM security provider settings (bouncy castle) Resolved

Attachments

crash-2013-04-19_16.55.22-server.txt

Comments 6

Anon Ymus 2013-04-19T15:16:23Z

The new launcher is not meant to run these versions yet.

Erik Broes 2013-04-19T15:18:05Z

If you could zip up all your version.json files you created to make this work I could take a look at it, besides that, the request is indeed a bit invalid for now 😉

Karl Håkansson 2013-04-19T15:38:54Z

Hey Erik,

I've uploaded the 2 .json files that I used.

Here's the .json file that the launcher downloads;
http://mcvc.in/tmp/new_mainClass_MVC.json

And here's the .json file that I used to run older versions;
http://mcvc.in/tmp/old_mainClass_MVC.json

It's not much. All I did was edit the mainClass.

Regards,
Karl H.

Erik Broes 2013-04-19T18:03:49Z

Remove all the dependencies already inside the jars.

Karl Håkansson 2013-04-20T07:02:10Z

Not sure if I got them all, but I removed jcraft and paulscode from the jar. Those were the only two I could find. Still crashes when joining a server or creating a world.

Crash report:
http://mcvc.in/tmp/crash-2013-04-20_08.31.32-server.txt

Thanks for your help Erik 🙂

Karl Håkansson 2013-04-23T20:57:36Z

Not sure why this was assigned as a duplicate. It's not the same issue as the other guy. (Both bouncycastle, but not the same cause)

That was 1.4.6 and he installed something, this is just the new launcher with an older, non-modified jar file. So I suggest you don't assign this as a duplicate.