Hi,
for the change between versions there are these two screnshots
1.14.4 2020-06-28_22.22.16.png -> coordinates 373.461/63.0/624.698
1.16.1 2020-06-28_22.23.30.png -> coordinates 373.517/63.0/624.813
this is a minor difference, but I can try to do the screenshots again, trying to get a more proper position
for the biome change within a block at different height ... there are the following screenshots
1.16.1 2020-06-28_22.43.55.png -> coordinates 341.561/55.73595/562.500 mineccraft_field_shore
1.16.1 2020-06-28_22.44.00.png -> coordinates 341.561/60.92070/562.500 ocean
1.16.1 2020-06-28_22.44.07.png -> coordinates 341.561/63.56681/562.500 mineccraft_field_shore
Here it is the exact same psotion only differences is height and the biome changes.
I'm not 100% sure, but as far as I know the biome should not change in different heights. All blocks with the same x and z coordinates should have the same biome.
I added two new screenshots, where I teleported in the same position in version 1.14.4 (old-backup) and 1.16.1 at 373.5/63/624.5
2020-07-02_11.00.56_1.14.4_minecraft_field_shore
2020-07-02_11.04.18_1.16.1_cold_ocean
As I stated before ...
1) it changed between versions -> we could live with that and already removed a huge amount of blocks, but as far as I know it should not happen?
2) it changes between heights at the same x/z coordinate what should definetly not happen, and this is bad, because you can't be sure with the biome and where to remove blocks
Regards
edit: shall I remove the two screenshots which do not have the same position? (2020-06-28_22_34_40.png and 2020-06-28_22_34_44.png)
Now this is interesting.
When I look at the same block as spectator and survival at the same time (2020-06-28_22.34.40.png = spectator ... 2020-06-28_22.34.44.png = survival) the spectator shows ocean and the survival shows minecraft_field_shore
When I use the spectator account to hover above and blow the block, the biome changes ... from minecraft_field_shore at y=55 (2020-06-28_22.43.55.png) to ocean at y=60 (2020-06-28_22.44.00.png) and back to minecraft_field_shore at y=63 (2020-06-28_22.44.07.png)
I also provided screenshots from the same block at 1.14.4 and now at 1.16.1
2020-06-28_22.22.16.png and 2020-06-28_22.23.30.png
clearly changed biome
Hi,
thx for the response. This is the latest log from today. If you need more information, pls tell me what else you need.
Regards
edit: as additional information. I removed all new ocean blocks. and I tried to locate the block where a mob spawns. its definitely a mushroom_field_shore biome. as example targeted block 357/62/697) seed is -319238140464856 ... if you need I can login with a spectator separately to identify more blocks
can confirm it still exists in current Snapshot 19W09A
(age jumped from 5 to 18)
Tried it a little bit further and after a few times the age went down. So its randomly increasing and decreasing. (See Screeshots 3 and 4)
Hi,
thx, for your answer. But from my point of view its not completly solved. So I understood there are vertical biomes now (but the wiki still says it's not implemented yet -> https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/Biome changes for 1.15 19w36a). Well I'm fine with that.
But why do Mobs spawn on blocks which are currently mushroom_field_shore (in 1.16.1) with ocean, cold_ocean, or deep_ocean below (on another y-level) the blocks the mobs are spawning on? This does not make any sense, because the blocks they are spawning on are mushroom_field_shore which my original headline stated. Or am I completly wrong and the information from the wiki is not correct that mushroom_field_shore has the same spawn rules like mushroom_field ... which means no natural mob spawning besides spawners (https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/Mushroom_Fields#Mushroom_Field_Shore)
And it was my conclusion (ok, which seemed to be wrong) that the problem came from the changed biome.
Should I open a new ticket for that or is this also as intended?
Regards