When I type this command :
/particle blockcrack_1_0 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 1
I get an error in the console (no crash):
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> [17:59:00] [Server thread/ERROR]: Couldn't process command: 'particle blockcrack_1_0 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 1'
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 1
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at ca.b(SourceFile:85) ~[14w28a.jar:?]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at ab.a(SourceFile:79) [14w28a.jar:?]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at ab.a(SourceFile:62) [14w28a.jar:?]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at qw.d(SourceFile:613) [14w28a.jar:?]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at qw.a(SourceFile:600) [14w28a.jar:?]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at ln.a(SourceFile:37) [14w28a.jar:?]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at ln.a(SourceFile:9) [14w28a.jar:?]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at ic.run(SourceFile:13) [14w28a.jar:?]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source) [?:1.8.0]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source) [?:1.8.0]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.x(SourceFile:555) [14w28a.jar:?]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.w(SourceFile:510) [14w28a.jar:?]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at cwg.w(SourceFile:132) [14w28a.jar:?]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.run(SourceFile:426) [14w28a.jar:?]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) [?:1.8.0]
[17:59:00 INFO]: Client> [17:59:00] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] An unknown error occurred while attempting to perform this command
Linked issues
is duplicated by 6
MC-60838
Particles "iconcrack_", "blockcrack_" and "blockdust_" not working: Unknown effect name
Resolved
MC-61773
/particle blockcrack_35_11 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 1 fails with an error
Resolved
MC-61873
Particle Command Iconcrack Error
Resolved
MC-62083
blockcrack and iconcrack particles do not work with the particle command
Resolved
MC-62245
/particle blockcrack not working
Resolved
Comments 6
How does it work for itemcrack then? I tested many commands and I didn't find a working one :
/particle iconcrack_351 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 0.1 1000
Regular ink sac spawn normaly, but when I try to spawn Red rose particle( #351/1):
EDIT : this should work
/particle iconcrack_351_1 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 0.1 1000The old syntax obviously don't work(still get an exception)
Given that Item Id are a Short type(or used to, I don't know) , itemId | (metaData << 16) would still fit in an Integer.315 | (1 << 16) = 65851But this don't work (nothing spawn, but I get an normal info message in the chat):/particle iconcrack_65851 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 0.1 1000
I also tried these one (<<8, <<12, <<20, <<24) but none of them seem to work :/particle iconcrack_607 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 0.1 1000/particle iconcrack_4447 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 0.1 1000/particle iconcrack_1048927 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 0.1 1000/particle iconcrack_16777567 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 0.1 1000
How come this command doesn't work anymore.When I used it in 14w26c it works as intended but now I get an error in 14w28a saying [13:40:26] An unknown error occurred while attempting to perform this command. Something isn't working right and this problem isn't a works as intended.
Command: /particle blockdust_95_15 208 55 -813 10 23 20 1 10000
I posted all infos that you need to update your commands in my last comment. Stop using the bugtracker as discussion forum, please.
After a lot of research in the code, I found out that the correct syntax SHOULD be
/particle iconcrack_351_1 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 0.1 1000
but it seem that when the enum declare iconcrack, it only allow 1 extra param so when you want to specify a damage value (iconcrack_id_damage), it throw a java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 1
The types blockcrack_ and blockdust_ are working as I explained. After looking into iconcrack_ again, I realized it does indeed still work with 2 parameters: iconcrack_[id]_[data]
It's fixed in the next version, but all 3 of these particle types are subject to change again in the near future when we get rid of numerical ids for them.
The format of this particle effect changed recently. It is an internal effect, so the fix is that this particle effect is no longer listed as supported in the /particle command. It can still be used, but needs to be changed to the new format.
Instead of _1_0 which was block id and metadata before, it now only takes one parameter. the new value in this case is _1 and this is calculated like this:
newId = blockId | (metaData << 12)