As far as I can find the Netherite Pickaxe is supposed to have 2031 durability. Testing this on the bedrock edition of the game it only has 1968 durability. It is missing 63 durability.
Comments 8
Also, if the testing was done by mining blocks and then counting the number mined or remaining, if any of them "reappeared" as you were mining (aka "block lag" described in MCPE-48914), those would still use up durability on the tool.
went on a super flat world with no lag (or block lag)
lined up stone blocks
mined blocks with Netherite pickaxe (with only Silk Touch enchant) until it broke.
counted the blocks
Expected Results:
I was expecting to have 2031 blocks mined or close ( maybe one or two blocks off)
Observed Results:
Only counted 1968 blocks after pickaxe broke
Cannot reproduce, I obtained 2032 cobblestone by setting a command block to constantly replace a block of stone
@unknown:
Did you do the test more than once, and did you always get the same result?
How exactly did you "count" the blocks? Was this by seeing how many were in your inventory, or by subtracting from the "remaining" blocks after mining? If it was by inventory, are you certain you picked up every block?
In addition, "block lag" (blocks reappearing) can occur on any world, it is not limited to multiplayer or server. It just occurs far more frequently in those cases, especially when the Unbreaking enchantment is used.
Using a command block might possibly change the circumstances of the test, though that does confirm that Netherite pickaxe does at least start with 2032 durability.
I think all items/armour have a +1 to their durability, which is probably related to MC-120664 (and isn't too relevant in this ticket).
Can't reproduce. I created a flat world and used a command block to place exactly 2032 netherrack blocks. I then switched to adventure mode and gave me an efficiency V netherite pickaxe, and I was able to destroy every single one of them. If you have another way to reproduce it, please comment here.
Please update the description to list specifically how you did the testing so someone else can confirm the issue. The following format is recommended:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Observed Results:
...
Expected Results:
...