Hopper issue for "from hopper to hopper" row or loop circle

What do you mean that is going to be disabled by redstone?, i don't see any redstone in the pictures

What do you mean that is going to be disabled by redstone?, i don't see any redstone in the pictures

It is "like".
ex:
If there are 4 hoppers to transport 64 items. (row)
Normal:
64 0 0 0
63 1 0 0
62 1 1 0
61 1 1 1
60 1 1 2
59 1 1 3
......
1 1 1 61
0 1 1 62
0 0 1 63
0 0 0 64
Right?

But now is:
64 0 0 0
63 1 0 0
62 2 0 0
61 3 0 0
60 4 0 0
59 5 0 0
......
1 63 0 0
0 64 0 0
0 63 1 0
0 62 2 0
0 61 3 0
......
0 0 2 62
0 0 1 63
0 0 0 64
Is it correct?

Understand?

It is "like".
ex:
If there are 4 hoppers to transport 64 items. (row)
Normal:
64 0 0 0
63 1 0 0
62 1 1 0
61 1 1 1
60 1 1 2
59 1 1 3
......
1 1 1 61
0 1 1 62
0 0 1 63
0 0 0 64
Right?

But now is:
64 0 0 0
63 1 0 0
62 2 0 0
61 3 0 0
60 4 0 0
59 5 0 0
......
1 63 0 0
0 64 0 0
0 63 1 0
0 62 2 0
0 61 3 0
......
0 0 2 62
0 0 1 63
0 0 0 64
Is it correct?

Understand?

Simple Hopper pipe. Some of them Behave as if deactivated by the hopper feeding it

Windows 10 0.14.0
Similar behaviour of Hoppers here, except only some hoppers do it.
It is as if another hopper pushing items into it is deactivating it.
The same hopper sucking items from a chest behaves normally.
Sometimes a hopper will buildup and hold a relatively constant number of items until the hopper pushing into it empties.
Only seems to happen with horizontal hopper pipes, not vertical ones

Windows 10 0.14.0
Similar behaviour of Hoppers here, except only some hoppers do it.
It is as if another hopper pushing items into it is deactivating it.
The same hopper sucking items from a chest behaves normally.
Sometimes a hopper will buildup and hold a relatively constant number of items until the hopper pushing into it empties.
Only seems to happen with horizontal hopper pipes, not vertical ones

@unknown, that's exactly what I'm seeing, and now it's very clear that it's a "Duplicate" of MCPE-13417. I've posted a detailed analysis there.

@unknown, that's exactly what I'm seeing, and now it's very clear that it's a "Duplicate" of MCPE-13417. I've posted a detailed analysis there.