When a damaged iron golem is glowing, it's outline looks weird
Related issues
is duplicated by
MC-174115
The Iron Golem's cracks are not effected by the Spectral Arrow on it's 3rd stage of cracking.
MC-176932
Display error when iron golem has glowing effect
MC-199895
Wrong Render with Glowing Damaged Iron Golem
MC-205746
Glitched golem
MC-206282
when shot with a spectral arrow an Iron Golam sometimes has gaps in the outline.
MC-206295
Glowing on Iron golem
MC-207523
Partly-damaged Iron Golems have holes in their texture that show up in the Glowing effect
MC-207618
Strange Glow Effect visual glitch on Iron Golems on their first Damage Skin Change
MC-216613
Iron Golem cracks glow with the Glowing effect
MC-220270
Iron Golem cracks are outlined by the glowing effect
MC-222841
Glow Texture on damaged Iron Golems not consistent
MC-223487
Graphical issue with iron golem damage cracks
MC-224027
Iron golems while glowing if they are broken the cool black dots are not visible
MC-225652
Iron Golem Dam
Attachments
Comments
migrated
migrated
WAI, Iron Golem's glow is meant to display it's damage stage
migrated
The glowing shouldn't be outlining the cracks, which that itself is not intentional.
migrated
Confirmed in 20w21a.
migrated
If the iron golem gets no cracks, then the glowing effect looks fine. After cracking twice, the outline of the glowing effect returns to normal.
[media]
(version 1.16.1)
Avoma
Can confirm in 20w51a.
Avoma
Can confirm in 21w06a.
Avoma
Can confirm in 21w07a. Feel free to use the following command to make reproducing this much easier:
/summon minecraft:iron_golem ~ ~ ~ {Health:74f,Glowing:1b,NoAI:1b}Appears fixed in 21w10a
migrated
Reintroduced in 21w11a
Affects 21w16a
pine1needle
Why was this report reopened and MC-220270 changed from a clone to a duplicate? As far as I am aware, reports are only reopened if a bug is marked as fixed in a specific version, but wasn't actually fixed in that version. That policy helps keep track of fix versions. This bug was indeed fixed in 21w10a, but it was reintroduced in 21w11a.
Chandler
The difference between this issue and others is that no specific fix was attempted for this issue afaik, and the issue only disappeared for a single-snapshot that wasn't intended as a fix and reappeared immediately afterwards.
pine1needle
Why is an intentional fix attempt necessary for the standard reopening policy to apply? The goal of being able to distinguish between truly fixed versions and falsely "fixed" versions is still just as relevant to accidental fixes as it is to intentional fixes.
Also, MC-220270 was already triaged and MC-173834 is not triaged.
Avoma
Can confirm in 21w17a.
migrated
Appears fixed
Possibly due to resolution of MC-223602