mojira.dev
MC-4426

Nether Brick slabs occupy already existing Damage Value ID

Nether Brick slabs added in the most recent snapshot occupy an already existing and well used metadata.

43:6 and 44:6 have been for countless versions known as "Seemless Stone Halfslabs". While not actually craftable these slabs have been available through mods, /give, server economies and WorldEditors.

By giving the 6 damage value for slabs to Nether Brick slabs you're making some maps not future compatible and leaving them in the past, you're destroying existing builds. A build using a brighter seemless slab build will most likely not work if turned so dark.

This issue could easily be solved by giving Nether Brick slabs Metadata 7 instead.

Attached are screenshots of block 43:6 and 44:6 in 1.4.5 and 1.4.6

Linked issues

Attachments

Comments 27

I am also experiencing this issue.

While technically never craftable in the game, seamless stone slab blocks are used widely in adventure maps, it would be a shame to see them loose support.

I would suggest incorporating these blocks into the game in a clearer way, like how there are chiselled and decorative versions of sandstone, slabs could be 'chiselled stone'.

Mortvert (Mort Imert)

Sorry, but this is a invalid issue. 44:6 was never a official block, and could be considered a bug. And you can still get them, using different ID. Until Mojang adds a new slab anyway.

Regardless of if it's an official block the way it was used by users should make it official, there are thousands people out there who used these blocks and no they're just supposed to kiss their builds good bye? I feel like Mojang should take that into consideration when they add a block ID.

Oliver Henriksson

It has been used and loved by users for quite some time, and similarly to how wooden slabs used to burn and people made builds around "unburnable wood" the new burnable wooden slab got a new ID instead. I don't see why this shouldn't be a case like that.

I agree with Oliver's statement. The Minecraft development team has made concessions in the past, I'm just not sure they're aware that 44:6 and 43:6 were ever items.

17 more comments

Why can't mojang replace wood textured stone slabs(43:2) instead of these slabs? This slab has been used as many builds and the wood textured slab has been obsolete since actual wood slabs were added to the game, while this has been used in many builds.

Sure, this has a lot of aesthetic use in-game, but you simply cannot treat a bug as a feature of the game and expect it to work forever. Even piston quasiconnectivity can be fixed in any future version, possibly even 1.5. You may argue it is a widely used "unintended feature", but in the end, that's what it is; unintended, no matter how popular it was. Map makers should also have expected this metadata change and at least use the last available metadata instead of using a slot likely to be taken up in the future. Using 43:15 would have future-proofed it much better than 43:6 did.
As for the "should be supported" arguments, that would be a feature request, not a bug report.

Please do not mark unreleased versions as affected. You do not have access to this yet.

Mojang likely won't use the old "stone" wood data value because there are still a lot of people with builds using them from before the change.

The unsupported block in question doesn't look like a double slab. If it is officially added, perhaps it would be better as a variant of another block, such as block 1.

ZeekDaGeek

(Unassigned)

Unconfirmed

block, metadata, netherbrick, slabs

Snapshot 12w49a, Minecraft 1.4.6, Minecraft 1.4.7

Retrieved