@unknown, please do not comment if you don't have new information to add.
That's a jungle bush 😉
Thanks for the info, @unknown! Upon some testing,
Actual score | Predicate | Condition passes? | Should this happen? |
---|---|---|---|
16777216 | 16777216 | yes | ✔ |
16777216 | 16777217 | yes | ❌ |
16777217 | 16777216 | yes | ❌ |
16777217 | 16777217 | yes | ✔ |
Actual score | Predicate | Condition passes? | Should this happen? |
---|---|---|---|
16777216 | 16777216 | yes | ✔ |
16777216 | 16777217 | yes | ❌ |
16777217 | 16777216 | no | ✔ |
16777217 | 16777217 | no | ❌ |
The behavior has changed between the two versions, so I have created a new ticket MC-254370 to track the new behaviors.
For documentation purposes in case future users come across this report, it is translatable.
Done.
The report is authenticated. Swapping out the UUID won't pass the authentication.
For general reference, the resolution of this ticket has been reviewed by Mojang and left unchanged.
@unknown, from what I understand the message won't be signed in that case.
I'm going to resolve this report as Invalid as multiple issues are mixed in the same ticket, most of which have already been tracked separately as private issues. Feel free to create a new report if you think the chat preview consent screen is insufficient in explaining that the player is responsible for the previewed content they sent.
@unknown meant creating a chat report in this manner, i.e. the described vulnerability doesn't exist.
Seems to have been fixed.
Moved to the MCPE project.
This is a bug tracker so it's not the best platform to work on data pack issues. As I mentioned earlier, feel free to join other communities for assistance as they have more proper tools to help you.
Please make sure there's no feature cycles in your data pack setup. Feel free to join third-party communities like Minecraft Commands for further assistance.
Minecraft Commands is a third party community Discord server for discussing data pack-related stuff and is not endorsed by the bug tracker blah blah blah
We have been informed commands are currently not tracked as parity issues, so this ticket will remain resolved for now. Thanks for your report!
Is this still an issue in the latest version?
I may be completely wrong, but this might be caused by the Codec in net/minecraft/world/entity/monster/warden/AngerManagement
trying to use ExtraCodecs.UUID
, something that reads from/writes to an int stream, as the key.
It looks slightly better for me now.
Can confirm on Firefox Nightly 95.0a1. The banner covers part of the website.
Particles are only rendered through water on the Fabulous! graphics setting.